Re: [PATCH 1/1] Let rebase.reschedulefailedexec only affect interactive rebases
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2019, 11:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1907011346411.44@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <0F745CE4-3203-4447-B1D5-937CCDCC64C7@commonkarma.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Vas Sudanagunta wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> It seems unintuitive that including a command to execute between each > rebase merge implies an interactive rebase. It’s no more interactive > than a sequence of rebase merges without intervening commands. A command > failure interrupts a rebase just as a merge conflict does. If the fact > that a rebase can be interrupts mid-sequence, then all rebases are > interactive.
Indeed. I would consider it an implementation detail that the `--exec` option uses the interactive rebase backend, and I would hate to force users to know about this.
Ciao, Johannes