Re: [PATCH 0/1] rebase: understand -C again, refactor
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2018, 14:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1811141525080.39@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20181114072909.GD19904@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Jeff King wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:38:24AM -0800, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > Phillip Wood reported a problem where the built-in rebase did not understand > > options like -C1, i.e. it did not expect the option argument. > > > > While investigating how to address this best, I stumbled upon > > OPT_PASSTHRU_ARGV (which I was so far happily unaware of). > > I was unaware of it, too.
Thanks, that makes me feel better ;-)
Show 10 quoted lines
> Looking at the OPT_PASSTHRU and its ARGV counterpart, I think the > original intent was that you'd pass through normal last-one-wins > individual options with OPT_PASSTHRU, and then list-like options with > OPT_PASSTHRU_ARGV. But here you've used the latter to pass sets of > individual last-one-wins options. > > That said, I think what you've done here is way simpler and more > readable than using a bunch of OPT_PASSTHRUs would have been. And even > if it was not the original intent of the ARGV variant, I can't see any > reason to avoid doing it this way.
Thank you, that makes me feel *even* better ;-)
Together with the extra-early error checking for incorrect -C and --whitespace options, I think we're in a much better place now.
Ciao, Dscho