Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Some add-on patches on top of dj/runtime-prefix

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> >
> >>> base-commit: b46fe60e1d7235603a29499822493bd3791195da
> >>
> >> Basing your work on the tip of 'next' is good for discussion, but
> >> not readily usable for final application.  Let me see if I can
> >> untangle the dependents to come up with a reasonable base.
> >
> > I'll queue this on top of a merge of 'dj/runtime-prefix' into 'master'.
> > Merging the resulting topic into 'next' and applying these patches
> > directly on top of 'next' result in identical trees, of course ;-)
> 
> Actually, these trivially rebase on top of dj/runtime-prefix, so
> I'll queue them like so without taking it hostage to other things in
> 'master'.  We'd want to keep these mergeable to any integration
> branch that dj/runtime-prefix would be merged to, so that is the
> most logical organization, I would think, even though I do not
> immediately see the reason why we would want to merge
> dj/runtime-prefix to 'maint' and lower right now.
> 
> Thanks.