Re: RFD: Shipping GitBrowser.js for instaweb
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 2, 2010, 20:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m3wrvmf4ei.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <4BDDA780.7090500@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> I was wondering whether it would make sense to ship GitBrowser.js with > Git and how much it would take to do so. > > My personal answer to the 1st Q is Yes: instaweb as well as simple > gitweb installs would benefit from a graphical DAG viewer. > > About the required effort I have no clue: I find it difficult to see > through which repo contains current gitweb, current repo.or.cz mods, and > especially the GitBrowser integration bits. Maybe we could ship the > integration bits without the actual GitBrowser if that is more feasible?
The integration parts are actually present in gitweb, I think. It is a matter of configuration to enable 'graphiclog' link like in http://repo.or.cz
GitBrowser.js is not, I think, the best solution for having graphical history in gitweb, but would do...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git