From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 20:14:27 GMT
Subject: Re: RFD: Shipping GitBrowser.js for instaweb
Message-ID: <m3wrvmf4ei.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <4BDDA780.7090500@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:

> I was wondering whether it would make sense to ship GitBrowser.js with
> Git and how much it would take to do so.
> 
> My personal answer to the 1st Q is Yes: instaweb as well as simple
> gitweb installs would benefit from a graphical DAG viewer.
> 
> About the required effort I have no clue: I find it difficult to see
> through which repo contains current gitweb, current repo.or.cz mods, and
> especially the GitBrowser integration bits. Maybe we could ship the
> integration bits without the actual GitBrowser if that is more feasible?

The integration parts are actually present in gitweb, I think.  It is
a matter of configuration to enable 'graphiclog' link like in
http://repo.or.cz

GitBrowser.js is not, I think, the best solution for having graphical
history in gitweb, but would do...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git