Re: [PATCHv3] Updated patch series for providing mechanism to list available repositories
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2010, 09:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m3sk35l2n6.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTikG0e5dtGgMe03s=PpG793B-MkrGjdGa0LuZ5zH@mail.gmail.com>
Greg Brockman <gdb@MIT.EDU> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > It would probably help if you re-send the entire thing again. > > Ok, will do so shortly. > > > It also seems to have an unaddressed comment > > (<7vlj96m4mc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> from Junio). > > Yep, my patch series actually does incorporate that comment. I didn't > respond to that explicitly because I didn't want to spam the list, but > in the future I'll be sure to respond to comments... I can imagine it > makes things much easier for > people-who-are-not-the-one-writing-the-patch to follow.
There are two possible solutions to providing comments about patch (I think they are covered in Documentation/SubmittingPatches).
First is reply to email like you would usually do, and below some delimiter, e.g. the "scissors" line i.e. '-- >8 --' put the patch itself. You might need to start it with 'Subject:' line if the title of the patch is different from the subject of email.
Second, which I think would be more appropriate in your situation, is to put comments about patch, for example how you did address the comments, and/or how the patch changed from previous version in the area between '---' delimiter line, and diffstat. See for example http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/151703
HTH
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git