Re: RFC: Website redesign

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 15, 2008, 07:53 UTC
Message-ID: <m3r6d7sgf9.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <pan.2008.04.15.03.25.00@progsoc.org>

Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.org> writes:

Show 13 quoted lines

> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:33:39 +0400, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:39:00PM +0000, Anand Kumria wrote:
>>> 
>>> That is basically the current "Web 2.0 style".
>>> 
>>> <http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/current-style.cfm>
>>> 
>>> One of the "hotties" is a software project, and Free Software at that.
>>> 
>>> I think the designs are a good first starting point.
>> 
>> And here is what validator.w3.org says about this page:

Please do not remove _important_ information. I have added what you should have quoted below:

>> This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!
>> Result:  	 Failed validation, 83 Errors

Show 8 quoted lines

> I'm sure you had some useful information to add, but it hasn't come 
> across. I've indicated that 'this; page notes current design style and 
> that it calls out a particular free software project (mozilla) for its 
> excellence.
> 
> But let's continue your, rather pointless, exercise:
> 
> http://git.or.cz/ - invalid, 9 errors

And when _examining_ this error one would realize that _all_ those errors are in _single_, old style (using unencoded ampersands) URL.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git