Re: RFC: Website redesign

From: Dill <sarpulhu@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 15, 2008, 05:05 UTC
Message-ID: <8607f754-92c8-49ca-9bc9-11e58b66ef40@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <pan.2008.04.15.03.25.00@progsoc.org>

For what it's worth my pages had zero errors. ;) And if it was up to me, which it isn't I'd vote that the page change to this: http://sarpulhu.googlepages.com/git7 (minus the madison word of course)

On Apr 14, 9:24 pm, Anand Kumria <wildf...@progsoc.org> wrote:

Show 32 quoted lines

> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:33:39 +0400, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:39:00PM +0000, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> >> That is basically the current "Web 2.0 style".
>
> >> <http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/current-style.cfm>
>
> >> One of the "hotties" is a software project, and Free Software at that.
>
> >> I think the designs are a good first starting point.
>
> > And here is what validator.w3.org says about this page:
>
> I'm sure you had some useful information to add, but it hasn't come
> across. I've indicated that 'this; page notes current design style and
> that it calls out a particular free software project (mozilla) for its
> excellence.
>
> But let's continue your, rather pointless, exercise:
>
> http://git.or.cz/- invalid, 9 errors
>
> http://mozilla.org/- valid, 1 warning
>
> So well designed, and valid markup are possible.
>
> Anand
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html