Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] submodule: remove "--recursive-prefix"
- From
Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
- Date
- Jun 30, 2022, 23:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <kl6ltu81sokr.fsf@chooglen-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <220701.865ykhdboc.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jun 30 2022, Glen Choo via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> = Series history >> >> Changes in v2: >> >> * Rebase onto ab/submodule-cleanup (previously master) >> * Cherry pick https://github.com/avar/git/commit/f445c57490d into 4/6 >> * Style fixes in .c and tests > > Thanks for the update, Looks like something happened with GGG to send > the base series + yours, I confirmed that 1-13/18 are the same as my > series in gitster/ab/submodule-cleanup.
Yes, oops. I resent this as v3 (sans your base), but you can ignore that :P
Show 26 quoted lines
> I played around with this a bit, and pushed some amends to > https://github.com/avar/git/tree/avar/pr-git-1282/chooglen/submodule/remove-recursive-prefix-v2; > which you should take more as the results of poking around, I think this > is fine as-is if Junio would like to pick it up, sans the possible bug > mentioned below. > > A range-diff of the changes I made follows below, changes: > > * Split up the "add tests" to a new commit :) You mentioned > "test_expect_failure", I just assumed we'd use test_expect_succes, > and then the 2nd commit has this test change: > > diff --git a/t/t7406-submodule-update.sh b/t/t7406-submodule-update.sh > index 9a076e025f3..6cc07460dd2 100755 > --- a/t/t7406-submodule-update.sh > +++ b/t/t7406-submodule-update.sh > @@ -1163 +1163 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update should skip unmerged submodules' ' > - Skipping unmerged submodule middle//bottom > + Skipping unmerged submodule middle/bottom > @@ -1176 +1176 @@ test_expect_success 'submodule update --recursive skip submodules with strategy= > - Skipping submodule '\''../middle/'\'' > + Skipping submodule '\''middle/bottom'\'' > > Which I think makes it much easier to explain the change itself, the > first commit basically just says "tests for existing behavior, see > the next commit for details".
Ah, I see what you meant now. Makes sense.
Show 14 quoted lines
> * Used test_cmp instead of "grep -F", makes for easier to grok output :) > > * I had to squint a bit at the change from strvec_pushl() to > strvec_pushf(). > > I.e. we're changing both that we're passing "--foo bar" > v.s. "--foo=bar" *and* "bar" v.s. "bar/", but as the commit message > notes it's just the latter that matters. > > Just a nit, but I think it's a bit easier to reason about just > changing the one thing we need to change there, although that means > giving the "if" braces. This also leaves the "--super-prefix" code > consistent with all the other places where we > "strvec.*--super-prefix" at the end.
Both sound good.
> * We can just declare some of the variables and initialize them at the > beginning, but couldn't when they were a strbuf.
I think this is just "char *displaypath" in 2/7 aka d1a47d302e (submodule--helper update: use display path helper, 2022-06-28)? That change makes sense.
> * Your 18/18 has some odd code formatting of "var =\n\t\tvalue(..." > when we usually do "var = value(...\n...".
Thanks for catching that. I could have sworn that came from "make style".
Show 10 quoted lines
> * You appear to have (and I haven't "fixed" it here) in 13/18 mentioned > "While we're fixing the display names, also fix inconsistent quoting > of the submodule name", but as the test_cmp shows we appear not to > have done that part at all? Is this referring to a forgotten change > where we should be saying (note the added '-quotes): > > Skipping unmerged submodule 'middle/bottom' > > Either that's what you mean & you forgot, or we're missing a test, or > I'm misunderstanding it...
Yes, this is a genuine error. In v2, I dropped this change (as you suggested) and I neglected to amend the comit message..
> I hope this helps, at least some of it...
Thanks! Yes it helps a lot. If you don't mind, I'll roll your commits + the commit message fix as v4.
Show 200 quoted lines
> 1: 64c138df196 ! 1: 3d9977006d3 submodule--helper update: use display path helper
> @@ Metadata
> Author: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
>
> ## Commit message ##
> - submodule--helper update: use display path helper
> + submodule--helper tests: add missing "display path" coverage
>
> There are two locations in prepare_to_clone_next_submodule() that
> - manually calculate the submodule display path, but should just use
> - do_get_submodule_displaypath() for consistency.
> -
> - Do this replacement and reorder the code slightly to avoid computing
> - the display path twice.
> -
> - This code was never tested, and adding tests shows that both these sites
> - have been computing the display path incorrectly ever since they were
> - introduced in 48308681b0 (git submodule update: have a dedicated helper
> - for cloning, 2016-02-29) [1]:
> -
> - - The first hunk puts a "/" between recursive_prefix and ce->name, but
> - recursive_prefix already ends with "/".
> - - The second hunk calls relative_path() on recursive_prefix and
> - ce->name, but relative_path() only makes sense when both paths share
> - the same base directory. This is never the case here:
> - - recursive_prefix is the path from the topmost superproject to the
> - current submodule
> - - ce->name is the path from the root of the current submodule to its
> - submodule.
> - so, e.g. recursive_prefix="super" and ce->name="submodule" produces
> - displayname="../super" instead of "super/submodule".
> -
> - While we're fixing the display names, also fix inconsistent quoting of
> - the submodule name.
> -
> - [1] I verified this by applying the tests to 48308681b0.
> + manually calculate the submodule display path, as discussed in the
> + next commit the "Skipping" output isn't exactly what we want, but
> + let's test how we behave now, before changing the existing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
> -
> - ## builtin/submodule--helper.c ##
> -@@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static int prepare_to_clone_next_submodule(const struct cache_entry *ce,
> - const char *update_string;
> - enum submodule_update_type update_type;
> - char *key;
> -- struct strbuf displaypath_sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> - struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> -- const char *displaypath = NULL;
> -+ char *displaypath;
> - int needs_cloning = 0;
> - int need_free_url = 0;
> -
> -+ displaypath = do_get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name,
> -+ suc->update_data->prefix,
> -+ suc->update_data->recursive_prefix);
> -+
> - if (ce_stage(ce)) {
> -- if (suc->update_data->recursive_prefix)
> -- strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s/%s", suc->update_data->recursive_prefix, ce->name);
> -- else
> -- strbuf_addstr(&sb, ce->name);
> -- strbuf_addf(out, _("Skipping unmerged submodule %s"), sb.buf);
> -+ strbuf_addf(out, _("Skipping unmerged submodule %s"), displaypath);
> - strbuf_addch(out, '\n');
> - goto cleanup;
> - }
> -
> - sub = submodule_from_path(the_repository, null_oid(), ce->name);
> -
> -- if (suc->update_data->recursive_prefix)
> -- displaypath = relative_path(suc->update_data->recursive_prefix,
> -- ce->name, &displaypath_sb);
> -- else
> -- displaypath = ce->name;
> --
> - if (!sub) {
> - next_submodule_warn_missing(suc, out, displaypath);
> - goto cleanup;
> -@@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static int prepare_to_clone_next_submodule(const struct cache_entry *ce,
> - "--no-single-branch");
> -
> - cleanup:
> -- strbuf_release(&displaypath_sb);
> -+ free(displaypath);
> - strbuf_release(&sb);
> - if (need_free_url)
> - free((void*)url);
> + Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
>
> ## t/t7406-submodule-update.sh ##
> @@ t/t7406-submodule-update.sh: test_expect_success 'submodule update --filter sets partial clone settings' '
> @@ t/t7406-submodule-update.sh: test_expect_success 'submodule update --filter sets
> + # because of its unmerged state
> + test_config -C top-cloned submodule.middle.update !true &&
> + git -C top-cloned submodule update --recursive 2>actual.err &&
> -+ grep -F "Skipping unmerged submodule middle/bottom" actual.err
> ++ cat >expect.err <<-\EOF &&
> ++ Skipping unmerged submodule middle//bottom
> ++ EOF
> ++ test_cmp expect.err actual.err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'submodule update --recursive skip submodules with strategy=none' '
> @@ t/t7406-submodule-update.sh: test_expect_success 'submodule update --filter sets
> + test_commit -C top-cloned/middle/bottom downstream_commit &&
> + git -C top-cloned/middle config submodule.bottom.update none &&
> + git -C top-cloned submodule update --recursive 2>actual.err &&
> -+ grep -F "Skipping submodule ${SQ}middle/bottom${SQ}" actual.err
> ++ cat >expect.err <<-\EOF &&
> ++ Skipping submodule '\''../middle/'\''
> ++ EOF
> ++ test_cmp expect.err actual.err
> +'
> +
> test_done
> -: ----------- > 2: d1a47d302ee submodule--helper update: use display path helper
> 2: d3e803a4630 ! 3: a5b30ac94e6 submodule--helper: don't recreate recursive prefix
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static void update_data_to_args(struct update_data
> - if (update_data->recursive_prefix)
> - strvec_pushl(args, "--recursive-prefix",
> - update_data->recursive_prefix, NULL);
> -+ if (update_data->displaypath)
> -+ strvec_pushf(args, "--recursive-prefix=%s/",
> -+ update_data->displaypath);
> ++ if (update_data->displaypath) {
> ++ strvec_push(args, "--recursive-prefix");
> ++ strvec_pushf(args, "%s/", update_data->displaypath);
> ++ }
> if (update_data->quiet)
> strvec_push(args, "--quiet");
> if (update_data->force)
> 3: 1f7cf6ffaf1 = 4: 0ea102882a7 submodule--helper: use correct display path helper
> 4: 85e65f143b6 = 5: 8085bc83a0c submodule--helper: remove unused SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX flags
> 5: 1d8b6b244dc ! 6: 4c00a1b496a submodule--helper update: use --super-prefix
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: struct submodule_update_clone {
> enum submodule_update_type update_default;
> struct object_id suboid;
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static int prepare_to_clone_next_submodule(const struct cache_entry *ce,
> -
> - displaypath = do_get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name,
> - suc->update_data->prefix,
> -- suc->update_data->recursive_prefix);
> -+ get_super_prefix());
> -
> - if (ce_stage(ce)) {
> - strbuf_addf(out, _("Skipping unmerged submodule %s"), displaypath);
> + char *key;
> + struct update_data *ud = suc->update_data;
> + char *displaypath = do_get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name, ud->prefix,
> +- ud->recursive_prefix);
> ++ get_super_prefix());
> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> + int needs_cloning = 0;
> + int need_free_url = 0;
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static void update_data_to_args(struct update_data *update_data, struct strvec *
> {
> enum submodule_update_type update_type = update_data->update_default;
>
> - strvec_pushl(args, "submodule--helper", "update", "--recursive", NULL);
> - strvec_pushf(args, "--jobs=%d", update_data->max_jobs);
> - if (update_data->displaypath)
> -- strvec_pushf(args, "--recursive-prefix=%s/",
> -+ strvec_pushf(args, "--super-prefix=%s/",
> - update_data->displaypath);
> + if (update_data->displaypath) {
> +- strvec_push(args, "--recursive-prefix");
> ++ strvec_push(args, "--super-prefix");
> + strvec_pushf(args, "%s/", update_data->displaypath);
> + }
> + strvec_pushl(args, "submodule--helper", "update", "--recursive", NULL);
> + strvec_pushf(args, "--jobs=%d", update_data->max_jobs);
> if (update_data->quiet)
> 6: a21e8cd174d ! 7: 639f07e4b84 submodule--helper: remove display path helper
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static void init_submodule(const char *path, const
> sub = submodule_from_path(the_repository, null_oid(), path);
>
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static int prepare_to_clone_next_submodule(const struct cache_entry *ce,
> + enum submodule_update_type update_type;
> + char *key;
> + struct update_data *ud = suc->update_data;
> +- char *displaypath = do_get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name, ud->prefix,
> +- get_super_prefix());
> ++ char *displaypath = get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name, ud->prefix);
> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> int needs_cloning = 0;
> int need_free_url = 0;
> -
> -- displaypath = do_get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name,
> -- suc->update_data->prefix,
> -- get_super_prefix());
> -+ displaypath =
> -+ get_submodule_displaypath(ce->name, suc->update_data->prefix);
> -
> - if (ce_stage(ce)) {
> - strbuf_addf(out, _("Skipping unmerged submodule %s"), displaypath);
> @@ builtin/submodule--helper.c: static int update_submodule(struct update_data *update_data)
> {
> ensure_core_worktree(update_data->sm_path);