Re: Build fixes for another obscure Unix

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
> <jason.j.pyeron.ctr@mail.mil> wrote:
>>> Would there be any interest in applying such individual
>>> compatibility fixes for this system, even if a full port doesn't
>>> reach completion?
>>
>> What are the down sides? Can your changes be shown to not impact
>> builds on other systems?
>
> I've pushed a handful of small compatibility patches to GitHub[1]
> which are enough to successfully compile the project.  The default
> values of the new variables should make them unnoticeable to other
> systems.
>
> Are there any concerns with this type of change?  If they would be
> acceptable, I can try sending the first four of those patches to the
> list properly.  (I expect the last two may be tweaked as I continue
> working with the port.)
>
> I do have a concern with strings.h, though.  That file will be
> included for most people who run ./configure, when it wasn't before.
> Do you think it's worth making a more detailed test to see if
> strcasecmp is still undefined after string.h is included, rather than
> just testing for the header's existence?
>
> Thanks.
>
> David
>
> [1] https://github.com/dm0-/git/commits