Re: best way to fastforward all tracking branches after a fetch
- From
- Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2011, 19:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <hbf.20111213g43t@bombur.uio.no>
- In-Reply-To
- <1kc5m38.m71ik21ytxkhbM%lists@haller-berlin.de>
Stefan Haller writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> wrote: >> Local branches can track each other. So the script needs to toposort >> the branches, or to loop until either nothing was done or an error >> happened. (The latter to prevent an eternal loop on error.) > > Is this just theoretical, or are there real use cases for this? What > would be a workflow with such a local tracking branch?
Personally I don't care much, I just noted that the script did not match the question in the subject line.
-- Hallvard