From: Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:05:50 GMT
Subject: Re: best way to fastforward all tracking branches after a fetch
Message-ID: <hbf.20111213g43t@bombur.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <1kc5m38.m71ik21ytxkhbM%lists@haller-berlin.de>

Stefan Haller writes:
>Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> wrote:
>> Local branches can track each other.  So the script needs to toposort
>> the branches, or to loop until either nothing was done or an error
>> happened.  (The latter to prevent an eternal loop on error.)
> 
> Is this just theoretical, or are there real use cases for this? What
> would be a workflow with such a local tracking branch?

Personally I don't care much, I just noted that the script did not
match the question in the subject line.

-- 
Hallvard