Re: Opinions on merging questions (Was: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2022, #01; Thu, 3))

> Hi,
> 
> I thought I'd respond to some of your questions with my opinion and
> pointers, in case it's helpful...
> 
>> * pw/fix-some-issues-in-reset-head (2022-01-26) 14 commits
>>   - rebase -m: don't fork git checkout
>>   - rebase --apply: set ORIG_HEAD correctly
>>   - rebase --apply: fix reflog
>>   - reset_head(): take struct rebase_head_opts
>>   - rebase: cleanup reset_head() calls
>>   - create_autostash(): remove unneeded parameter
>>   - reset_head(): make default_reflog_action optional
>>   - reset_head(): factor out ref updates
>>   - reset_head(): remove action parameter
>>   - rebase --apply: don't run post-checkout hook if there is an error
>>   - rebase: do not remove untracked files on checkout
>>   - rebase: pass correct arguments to post-checkout hook
>>   - t5403: refactor rebase post-checkout hook tests
>>   - rebase: factor out checkout for up to date branch
>>
>>   Use an internal call to reset_head() helper function instead of
>>   spawning "git checkout" in "rebase", and update code paths that are
>>   involved in the change.
>>
>>   Will merge to 'next'?
>>   May want to rename the topic branch to "pw/use-in-process-checkout-in-rebase"
>>   or something before doing so.
>>   source: <pull.1049.v3.git.1643202349.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
> 
> This series seems good to me and I think it's ready, but the topic
> branch rename sounds good.