Re: [PATCH 5/5] config: add default aliases
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2021, 15:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fac9cb8b-90e2-d6fc-2382-629e3a345756@iee.email>
- In-Reply-To
- <044e01d771a6$7c8cefc0$75a6cf40$@nexbridge.com>
On 05/07/2021 15:02, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> I do not want anything helping out the use of rebase, which we in our shop - except for rebase --autosquash to fix up topic branches for delivery.
I was wondering what the background/context to the 'actively discourage' is?
I'd have expected that some in-place rework (i.e. rebase) could happen before code review, with possible further rework beyond simple fixup/squash commits being possible after review (if demanded), but with the same fork-point (rather than following movements in the 'upstream'), rather similar to Git's development. i.e. Is it that the fork-point shouldn't be moved without good reason and permission, or something else?
just wondering...
-- Philip