Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #06; Wed, 20)
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 21, 2010, 01:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e1001201706i4c7ffaecs55153c9220bc5992@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljfsxos5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Heya,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:52, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> * jh/notes (2010-01-17) 23 commits > - builtin-gc: Teach the new --notes option to garbage-collect notes > - Notes API: gc_notes(): Prune notes that belong to non-existing objects > - t3305: Verify that removing notes triggers automatic fanout consolidation > - builtin-notes: Teach -d option for deleting existing notes > - Teach builtin-notes to remove empty notes > - Teach notes code to properly preserve non-notes in the notes tree > - t3305: Verify that adding many notes with git-notes triggers increased fanout > - t3301: Verify successful annotation of non-commits > - Builtin-ify git-notes > - Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes > - Notes API: Allow multiple concurrent notes trees with new struct notes_tree > - Notes API: write_notes_tree(): Store the notes tree in the database > - Notes API: for_each_note(): Traverse the entire notes tree with a callback > - Notes API: get_note(): Return the note annotating the given object > - Notes API: remove_note(): Remove note objects from the notes tree structure > - Notes API: add_note(): Add note objects to the internal notes tree structure > - Notes API: init_notes(): Initialize the notes tree from the given notes ref > - Add tests for checking correct handling of $GIT_NOTES_REF and core.notesRef > - Notes API: get_commit_notes() -> format_note() + remove the commit restriction > - Minor non-functional fixes to notes.c > (merged to 'next' on 2010-01-02 at ae42130) > + Add more testcases to test fast-import of notes > + Rename t9301 to t9350, to make room for more fast-import tests > + fast-import: Proper notes tree manipulation > > Updated with a re-roll.
Just checking, you reverted all from next (with exception of the first three), and now re-queued it to pu, with the first three still in next? Or did I mis-remember and did only the first three make it to next in the first place?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier