From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:06:23 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #06; Wed, 20) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vljfsxos5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Heya, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * jh/notes (2010-01-17) 23 commits >  - builtin-gc: Teach the new --notes option to garbage-collect notes >  - Notes API: gc_notes(): Prune notes that belong to non-existing objects >  - t3305: Verify that removing notes triggers automatic fanout consolidation >  - builtin-notes: Teach -d option for deleting existing notes >  - Teach builtin-notes to remove empty notes >  - Teach notes code to properly preserve non-notes in the notes tree >  - t3305: Verify that adding many notes with git-notes triggers increased fanout >  - t3301: Verify successful annotation of non-commits >  - Builtin-ify git-notes >  - Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes >  - Notes API: Allow multiple concurrent notes trees with new struct notes_tree >  - Notes API: write_notes_tree(): Store the notes tree in the database >  - Notes API: for_each_note(): Traverse the entire notes tree with a callback >  - Notes API: get_note(): Return the note annotating the given object >  - Notes API: remove_note(): Remove note objects from the notes tree structure >  - Notes API: add_note(): Add note objects to the internal notes tree structure >  - Notes API: init_notes(): Initialize the notes tree from the given notes ref >  - Add tests for checking correct handling of $GIT_NOTES_REF and core.notesRef >  - Notes API: get_commit_notes() -> format_note() + remove the commit restriction >  - Minor non-functional fixes to notes.c >  (merged to 'next' on 2010-01-02 at ae42130) >  + Add more testcases to test fast-import of notes >  + Rename t9301 to t9350, to make room for more fast-import tests >  + fast-import: Proper notes tree manipulation > > Updated with a re-roll. Just checking, you reverted all from next (with exception of the first three), and now re-queued it to pu, with the first three still in next? Or did I mis-remember and did only the first three make it to next in the first place? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier