Re: "What's cooking" incremental edition

From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 10, 2010, 20:21 UTC
Message-ID: <fabb9a1e1001101221i389c05a8v7ff241859d5e8dae@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vmy0lpwes.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Heya,

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:55, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

>  * jn/makefile (2010-01-06) 4 commits
> - - Makefile: consolidate .FORCE-* targets
> - - Makefile: learn to generate listings for targets requiring special flags
> - - Makefile: use target-specific variable to pass flags to cc
> - - Makefile: regenerate assembler listings when asked
> +  (merged to 'next' on 2010-01-10 at f5a5d42)
> + + Makefile: consolidate .FORCE-* targets
> + + Makefile: learn to generate listings for targets requiring special flags
> + + Makefile: use target-specific variable to pass flags to cc
> + + Makefile: regenerate assembler listings when asked

Fwiw, I find it harder to read due to the now ambiguous meaning of the
+ and - (it could either mean something is in pu/next, or that the
topic changed). Of course this is partly caused by the fact that I
don't read emails in fixed font (by default), but perhaps it's worth
considering using different symbols for pu/next-ness?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier