From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:21:20 GMT Subject: Re: "What's cooking" incremental edition Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vmy0lpwes.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Heya, On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:55, Junio C Hamano wrote: >  * jn/makefile (2010-01-06) 4 commits > - - Makefile: consolidate .FORCE-* targets > - - Makefile: learn to generate listings for targets requiring special flags > - - Makefile: use target-specific variable to pass flags to cc > - - Makefile: regenerate assembler listings when asked > +  (merged to 'next' on 2010-01-10 at f5a5d42) > + + Makefile: consolidate .FORCE-* targets > + + Makefile: learn to generate listings for targets requiring special flags > + + Makefile: use target-specific variable to pass flags to cc > + + Makefile: regenerate assembler listings when asked Fwiw, I find it harder to read due to the now ambiguous meaning of the + and - (it could either mean something is in pu/next, or that the topic changed). Of course this is partly caused by the fact that I don't read emails in fixed font (by default), but perhaps it's worth considering using different symbols for pu/next-ness? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier