Re: [PATCH 2/2] read-tree: at least one tree-ish argument is required
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2009, 19:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e0912181124nef40a2dxac1b93f9dcc19bb8@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200912182004.25520.j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Heya,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 13:04, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Sorry to drag you into this discussion, but I felt this change is maint-worthy > (because the behavior is not only risky, but dangerous).
I agree, shouldn't such a dangerous function at least require a flag? 'git read-tree --empty' or something?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier