From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:24:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] read-tree: at least one tree-ish argument is required Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200912182004.25520.j.sixt@viscovery.net> Heya, On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 13:04, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Sorry to drag you into this discussion, but I felt this change is maint-worthy > (because the behavior is not only risky, but dangerous). I agree, shouldn't such a dangerous function at least require a flag? 'git read-tree --empty' or something? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier