Re: Continued work on sr/vcs-helper and sr/gfi-options
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 7, 2009, 00:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e0912061652s3133a8c8s8b43bbc666c6016f@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfx7nekuf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Heya,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 00:36, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> It would make sense if you use 1.6.6 features in your new series (as the > forkpoint of sr/vcs-helper is beginning to look a tad stale), but > otherwise unnecessary; that is the reason why I said it is "(optional)" > and it is up to what is in the remote-hg patch.
Gotcha, I don't think I use any 1.6.6 features though, so I don't think that will be necessary.
> I was thinking about carrying it myself (perhaps with help from you in > conflict resolution as necessary) when I wrote it
That would be great! If you are you offering to create the sr/pu-remote-hg branch and merge it to pu so that I can send patches based on that, please do. If not, what do I do instead? :).
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier