From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:52:24 GMT Subject: Re: Continued work on sr/vcs-helper and sr/gfi-options Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vfx7nekuf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Heya, On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 00:36, Junio C Hamano wrote: > It would make sense if you use 1.6.6 features in your new series (as the > forkpoint of sr/vcs-helper is beginning to look a tad stale), but > otherwise unnecessary; that is the reason why I said it is "(optional)" > and it is up to what is in the remote-hg patch. Gotcha, I don't think I use any 1.6.6 features though, so I don't think that will be necessary. > I was thinking about carrying it myself (perhaps with help from you in > conflict resolution as necessary) when I wrote it That would be great! If you are you offering to create the sr/pu-remote-hg branch and merge it to pu so that I can send patches based on that, please do. If not, what do I do instead? :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier