Re: check-ref-format question
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2009, 14:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e0905130740i56a05eaft3b3b28010d8d385b@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4A0AD5A2.2090103@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Heya,
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 16:13, Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
> The code has always behaved like C since its inception but I don't know > the rationale behind the 2 level requirement. Daniel, Junio?
Methinks that since it is a plumbing command it is up to the porcelain to translate "master" into "refs/heads/master" or "refs/remotes/origin/master" (or whatever is appropriate) before dispatching to check-ref-format?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier