From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:40:28 GMT
Subject: Re: check-ref-format question
Message-ID: <fabb9a1e0905130740i56a05eaft3b3b28010d8d385b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A0AD5A2.2090103@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Heya,

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 16:13, Michael J Gruber
<git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
> The code has always behaved like C since its inception but I don't know
> the rationale behind the 2 level requirement. Daniel, Junio?

Methinks that since it is a plumbing command it is up to the porcelain
to translate "master" into "refs/heads/master" or
"refs/remotes/origin/master" (or whatever is appropriate) before
dispatching to check-ref-format?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier