Re: [PATCH] Keep rename/rename conflicts of intermediate merges while doing recursive merge
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2007, 12:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eulimv$369$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070331114938.GB4377@steel.home>
Alex Riesen wrote:
> The result seem to be at least predictable. Still, doesn't it mean > that once a rename/rename conflict is in it has to be resolved > manually forever?
What about git-rerere2 idea (recording resolving of tree-level conflicts, i.e. rename/rename and such)?
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git