Re: [PATCH] Keep rename/rename conflicts of intermediate merges while doing recursive merge

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mar 31, 2007, 12:50 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0703311445190.4045@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <20070331114938.GB4377@steel.home>

Hi,

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Alex Riesen wrote:

> This patch leaves the base name in the resulting intermediate tree, to
> propagate the conflict from intermediate merges up to the top-level merge.

I'd rather have conflict files, i.e.

	for each entry in the index which is unmerged,
		write the file in this form:
		<<<<<<
		[stage2]
		======
		[stage3]
		>>>>>>

		mark as merged (i.e. remove stages 1--3 from the index, 
		and add the conflicted file as stage 0)

The big problem is that you _cannot_ leave unmerged entries in 
intermediate stages, because then, you could not write the tree. OTOH, you 
_need_ to mark them as unmerged _in the end_.
		
That problem keeps me from just whipping up a patch in a few minutes, 
sending it untested to the list, and get all the blame for it.

Ciao, Dscho