Re: [PATCH] git-explain
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2006, 10:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <el3ibq$9kn$2@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwt57j94c.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> [PATCH] git-explain > > This patch adds "git-explain" script that notices various clues > other commands can leave the working tree and repository in and > intended to guide the end user out of the confused mess.
I like it, although I think that it explains a bit too little about aborted git-rebase / git-am, and for example doesn't touch git-bisect at all. Both as an end-user script (BTW. the name could be changed using aliases), and as a policy for git commands.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git