Re: [PATCH] git-explain
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 6, 2006, 00:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612060125320.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vu009dhgz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But the more I think about it, I feel that "undo" is less important.
Me, too. I was really astonished that people said -- after quite some explanations -- "wow, you mean I did not lose any work?"
That's the nice thing about git: it is really hard to lose any objects. Unless you explicitely issue a "git prune", you can resurrect whatever was your state.
In this spirit, maybe it is time to enable reflog per default?
Ciao, Dscho