Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2006, 21:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eknj33$q2r$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <456F4E38.50001@codeweavers.com>
Robert Shearman wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Having the index exposed for even simple operations means that the user > has to initially learn three states instead of two. The worst thing > about the index is that it is a limbo state. The committed content is in > the history and can be viewed by gitk (and other tools that the user > will be introduced to later) and the working tree is exactly what the > user sees in their editor. Having a hidden state isn't very good from an > HCI point of view.
Index is accessible, just like committed contents. The fact that gitk, qgit, git-gui doesn't display state of index is their limitation.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git