Re: git and "dumb protocols"
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 2, 2006, 12:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eicnbe$v6l$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpq4ptixdfj.fsf@ecrins.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I'll probably do, but my concern is broader than that. I like the > ability to use almost any webhosting service for my revision control. > GNU Arch was quite good at that, bzr is also (doesn't support webdav > very well yet, but read-only-HTTP, sftp and ftp are there), so I'd > like git to do the same.
Well, git can fetch (read) via http, https, ftp, sftp, rsync, git, ssh+git; it can push via http(s) with WebDAV, and ssh+git (ssh+git meaning via ssh, with git installed on the server side).
BTW. rsync is considered obsolete, and suitable only for initial cloning, perhaps.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git