From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:12:53 GMT
Subject: Re: git and "dumb protocols"
Message-ID: <eicnbe$v6l$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <vpq4ptixdfj.fsf@ecrins.imag.fr>

Matthieu Moy wrote:

> I'll probably do, but my concern is broader than that. I like the
> ability to use almost any webhosting service for my revision control.
> GNU Arch was quite good at that, bzr is also (doesn't support webdav
> very well yet, but read-only-HTTP, sftp and ftp are there), so I'd
> like git to do the same.

Well, git can fetch (read) via http, https, ftp, sftp, rsync, git, ssh+git;
it can push via http(s) with WebDAV, and ssh+git (ssh+git meaning via ssh,
with git installed on the server side).

BTW. rsync is considered obsolete, and suitable only for initial cloning,
perhaps.
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git