Re: (unknown)

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 25, 2006, 14:53 UTC
Message-ID: <ehntnv$b1k$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1Gck2K-0003H4-00@dvr.360vision.com>

andyparkins@gmail.com wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> To easily differentiate the read-only upstream branches, from normal branches,
> default to cloning them with the prefix "up/" added to their branch names.
> This also abandons the idea of an "origin" branch which is now simply
> "up/master" and hence removes the special treatment that master was getting.
> (cherry picked from 33d89375652222c41fbf225f1e1c3bfb38b755b2 commit)
> Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
> ---
> I'm sure this will be an unwanted patch.  However, I really do think it's 
> important to highlight these upstream branches in some way.  I realise 
> renaming "origin" is probably not going to fly, but perhaps it would be okay 
> to have at least the non-origin branches prefixed?

Check if "git clone --use-separate-remote" isn't what you want.

And please correct mail sending.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git