Re: (unknown)
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2006, 22:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061025221659.GC10140@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200610252303.07900.andyparkins@gmail.com>
Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Wednesday 2006, October 25 19:38, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > I did try that, but then the branches don't appear in git branch. I > > > still like that they exist. > > > > "git branch -r" perhaps. > > That's pretty good. It makes things like > > git-log remotes/origin/master..master > > A bit long winded, but it's certainly what I asked for. > > You guys really have thought of everything.
Try the bash completion support in contrib/completion. If you are using the bash shell it does branch name completions for most commands, including both sides of the '..' in log there. At this point I can't use Git without it.