Re: [PATCH 17/27] diff-lib: ensure full index
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 23, 2021, 13:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ef818ccc-f502-b474-c126-7fd65d16db49@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BHsSpQieOGFPwXJ63qy1JhWcwu-bSvv1w7-yTZ6T4fx9Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/18/2021 1:24 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:17 PM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>>
>> Before iterating over all cache entries, ensure that a sparse index is
>> expanded to a full index to avoid unexpected behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> diff-lib.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
>> index b73cc1859a49..41d6fcec1a81 100644
>> --- a/diff-lib.c
>> +++ b/diff-lib.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ int run_diff_files(struct rev_info *revs, unsigned int option)
>>
>> if (diff_unmerged_stage < 0)
>> diff_unmerged_stage = 2;
>> +
>> entries = istate->cache_nr;
>> for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
>> unsigned int oldmode, newmode;
>
> I don't think adding a blank newline will ensure the index is expanded. ;-)Oops! This is one where I think we determined the loop doesn't need the guard, but I didn't remove the newline and hence the patch wasn't dropped.
Thanks, -Stolee