Re: Git Survey summary
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 21, 2006, 16:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <eeufqg$bvc$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060921163452.GW8259@pasky.or.cz>
Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> When reading the mailing list via the web I do tend to read through >> GMane more than MARC but I can't state why I have that preference. >> It just happens. Maybe I prefer white backgrounds over black ones? > > Surprisingly few web mailing list interfaces are actually usable for > reading threads. Gmane is, MARC isn't (you don't see the list of > references and replies to the current mail, and the next/prev in thread > links somehow don't seem to be very reliable). That's a killer feature > for me, if MARC had that I'd have preferred it (I like black background > and dislike frames).
From what I guessed, MARC groups threads by _title only_, while GMane seems to parse In-Reply-To:/References: headers for threading.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git