Re: Git Survey summary

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Sep 21, 2006, 16:34 UTC
Message-ID: <20060921163452.GW8259@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20060921162724.GE3934@spearce.org>

Dear diary, on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:27:24PM CEST, I got a letter where Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> said that...

Show 18 quoted lines

> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shawn Pearce wrote:
> > 
> > > Since Git uses a mailing list model it would be nice if the gitweb
> > > hyperlinks were into the marc and GMane archives by Message-ID;
> > 
> > Planned (as an example committag support).
> > 
> > Would it be better ti use MARC or GMane interface:
> >  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?i=200609200739.48732.alan%20()%20chandlerfamily%20!%20org%20!%20uk
> >  http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=<200609200739.48732.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> 
> 
> Well, the GMane link worked and displayed the thread; the MARC
> one didn't.  The GMane link is also less mangled.
> 
> When reading the mailing list via the web I do tend to read through
> GMane more than MARC but I can't state why I have that preference.
> It just happens.  Maybe I prefer white backgrounds over black ones?

Surprisingly few web mailing list interfaces are actually usable for reading threads. Gmane is, MARC isn't (you don't see the list of references and replies to the current mail, and the next/prev in thread links somehow don't seem to be very reliable). That's a killer feature for me, if MARC had that I'd have preferred it (I like black background and dislike frames).

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)