Re: Marking abandoned branches
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2006, 21:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ee9tcl$h98$2@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhczb7ay9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> What this suggests is that the core support we > will give needs a way to specify what subset of refs/* to > include. peek-remote allows you to do this and it is fairly > efficient for local case (although it could be made more > efficient by not using the general git_connect() framework if we > want a faster local-only command), but it gives back only the > object names.
What is the difference between peek-remote and ls-remotes in the local case, by the way?
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git