Re: Marking abandoned branches
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2006, 18:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ee9jv6$ga0$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmz93a9v9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Using tag has an added benefit that you now have a place to say > why you dropped it. So what we would need to support this is an > agreed-upon name under $GIT_DIR/refs/ that is omitted from > display by convention across Porcelains (the core side should > not ignore them because even when you are abandoning them, you > do not want to lose them),
I think that using hidden directory (dot-directory), e.g. $GIT_DIR/refs/.abandoned/ is a good idea... unless it conflicts somewhat with the way lock files are named...
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git