Re: [PATCH] git-checkout: Test for relative path use.

From: David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 9, 2007, 09:10 UTC
Message-ID: <ee77f5c20711090110s5d6c533et5e1e016a95fde943@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vfxzfvlch.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Nov 9, 2007 8:06 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> "David Symonds" <dsymonds@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > So what would you prefer? Bracketing the whole test in parentheses
> > looks ugly, but I can do that if that's the only option. If I look at
> > t5510-fetch.sh (one of yours, Junio), there is no directory
> > restoration in the case of test failure, as in my original patch.
>
> Yes, that is what I was referring to as "bad examples".  The way
> t4116 goes down to different directory do not look ugly to me.

Okay, thanks -- that's a useful example. I'll resend the patch shortly.

Dave.