Re: [PATCH] git-checkout: Test for relative path use.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2007, 01:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vd4ukxjxn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <ee77f5c20711081744p5d7b46fo88a582b9f5dbdab8@mail.gmail.com>
"David Symonds" <dsymonds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Nov 9, 2007 12:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > >> Seriously, that's a long standing limitation in the code, not to >> deal with arbitrary combination of ups and downs, but I do not >> think there is any fundamental reason to disallow something >> like: >> >> cd Documentation && git ls-files --full-name ../t >> >> Patches welcome. > > So you're otherwise happy with my tests, despite one of them > triggering an (unrelated to git-checkout) bug? Or would you prefer I > remove that particular failure from the tests and resend?
Are you really asking my preference? A patch to ls-files to make the test pass is my preference, of course ;-).
Haven't read your tests, though, but I see capable people already commented on the initial round so I do not expect it to be problematic.