Re: [PATCH] Rearrange git-format-patch synopsis to improve clarity.
- From
David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 5, 2007, 22:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ee77f5c20711051432w284cf22dx71192c145d25dced@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <119421522591-git-send-email-dsymonds@gmail.com>
On 11/5/07, David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com> wrote:
> [-s | --signoff] [<common diff options>] > - [--start-number <n>] [--numbered-files] > + [-n | --numbered-files | -N | --no-numbered] > + [--start-number <n>]
Now that I look at it again, it seems the long options look quite inconsistent. I think it should be either --numbered-files/--no-numbered-files or --numbered/--no-numbered. My preference is with the latter (for brevity), but that breaks backward-compatibility.
Would you accept a patch that changed --numbered-files to --numbered, and kept the former as a synonym?
Dave.