Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno

From: David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2007, 06:07 UTC
Message-ID: <ee77f5c20710152307n48431a6eu5dc95ee504968e4e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <85ve98gl57.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

On 16/10/2007, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Geert Bosch <bosch@adacore.com> writes:
>
> > On Oct 15, 2007, at 13:53, David Symonds wrote:
> >> That's also why I suggested "skip"; you might not be able to test a
> >> particular commit, but you might also not *want* to test a particular
> >> commit for some reason.
> >
> > Skip seems a great choice: it directly expresses the wish to
> > not consider a certain commit. The reason is unimportant.
>
> But it is an _action_, while "good" and "bad" are properties.

"skipped", then. Either way, something like this has got to be much better than "dunno".

Dave.