Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial
- From
- Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 29, 2009, 18:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ee2a733e0909291144g4b99ab7ay9e63bfac935013aa@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <m33a66br69.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On 2009-09-28, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> [..snip..] > Besides with nonlinear history with > revision numbers such as 12678 and 12687 you know that 12678 is older > than 12687 if and only if 12678 and 12687 are on the same line of > development. >
The statement above is incorrect!! In a Mercurial repo local revision numbers are strictly ordered in commit time. 12678 < 12687 means that 12678 was committed prior to 12687. But these two commits could belong to two completely unrelated lines of development.
--Leo--