Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial
- From
Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2009, 18:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <585748.13758.qm@web27802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <81b0412b0909271144o26743e05uac3132cdc5b530b@mail.gmail.com>
Another thing to consider: For what kind of project/language do you need git? What build tools are you using and how good is the integration into both git and hg?
LieGrue, strub
--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial > To: newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net > Cc: git@vger.kernel.org > Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 8:44 PM > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 20:10, Anteru > <newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net> > wrote: > > Yeah, well, the main question here is actually: Is > improved support for > > Windows one of the goals of future git development, or > is this a > > complete non-issue? > > I just hope it is not. Improved Windows support mostly > means lots of dead code (and that's the best outcome), > which no other platform can use. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >