Re: Possible --boundary bug

From: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 30, 2006, 20:55 UTC
Message-ID: <e5bfff550603301255j52c68963v4b8eebea697eeecf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e5bfff550603301034r58b38500ie5897ed06fce6e9a@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, the good description is below, please ignore the wrong previous one.

On 3/30/06, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 21 quoted lines

> Trying to convert qgit to use the new and cool --boundary option I
> found this one:
>
> From git tree
>
> $ git-rev-list --boundary --topo-order --parents 5aa44d5..ab57c8d |
> grep eb38cc689e8
> -e646de0d14bac20ef6e156c1742b9e62fb0b9020
> eb38cc689e84a8fd01c1856e889fe8d3b4f1bfb4
> 4b953cdc04fec8783e2c654a671005492fda9b01
> 5ca5396c9ecba947c8faac7673195d309a6ba2ea
> eb38cc689e84a8fd01c1856e889fe8d3b4f1bfb4
>
> and also
>
> $ git-rev-list --boundary --topo-order --parents 5aa44d5..ab57c8d |
> grep c64965750
> 8c0db2f5193153ea8a51bb45b0512c5a3889023b
> 21a02335f821c89a989cf0b533d2ae0adb6da16e
> c649657501bada28794a30102d9c13cc28ca0e5e
>

It seems the lines: -c649657501bada28794a30102d9c13cc28ca0e5e .......

and

-eb38cc689e84a8fd01c1856e889fe8d3b4f1bfb4 ......

are missing though the two revs are boundary revs.

Marco

 P.S: Sorry for lengthy output but  --abbrev option:

 git-rev-list --boundary --topo-order --abbrev=8 --parents  5aa44d5..ab57c8d

 does seems to work only for prettyprinted parent names, I guess this
from patches log messages because is not documented.