Re: Possible --boundary bug
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2006, 07:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v64lvvyev.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <e5bfff550603301255j52c68963v4b8eebea697eeecf@mail.gmail.com>
"Marco Costalba" <mcostalba@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry, the good description is below, please ignore the wrong previous one.
I think this patch should fix it.
-- >8 -- rev-list --boundary: fix re-injecting boundary commits.
Marco reported that
$ git rev-list --boundary --topo-order --parents 5aa44d5..ab57c8d
misses these two boundary commits.
c649657501bada28794a30102d9c13cc28ca0e5e
eb38cc689e84a8fd01c1856e889fe8d3b4f1bfb4Indeed, we can see that gitk shows these two commits at the bottom, because the --boundary code failed to output them.
The code did not check to avoid pushing the same uninteresting commit twice to the result list. I am not sure why this fixes the reported problem, but this seems to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> ---
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c index abc8745..c2a95aa 100644 --- a/revision.c +++ b/revision.c @@ -420,24 +420,33 @@ static void limit_list(struct rev_info * p = &commit_list_insert(commit, p)->next; } if (revs->boundary) { - list = newlist; - while (list) { + /* mark the ones that are on the result list first */ + for (list = newlist; list; list = list->next) { struct commit *commit = list->item; + commit->object.flags |= TMP_MARK; + } + for (list = newlist; list; list = list->next) { + struct commit *commit = list->item; struct object *obj = &commit->object; - struct commit_list *parent = commit->parents; - if (obj->flags & (UNINTERESTING|BOUNDARY)) { - list = list->next; - continue; - } - while (parent) { + struct commit_list *parent; + if (obj->flags & UNINTERESTING) + continue; + for (parent = commit->parents; + parent; + parent = parent->next) { struct commit *pcommit = parent->item; - parent = parent->next; if (!(pcommit->object.flags & UNINTERESTING)) continue; pcommit->object.flags |= BOUNDARY; + if (pcommit->object.flags & TMP_MARK) + continue; + pcommit->object.flags |= TMP_MARK; p = &commit_list_insert(pcommit, p)->next; } - list = list->next; + } + for (list = newlist; list; list = list->next) { + struct commit *commit = list->item; + commit->object.flags &= ~TMP_MARK; } } revs->commits = newlist;