Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)
On 26 Oct 2008 15:15:57 +0100, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> 1. Documentation and ease of use.
>
> Mercurial is supposedly better documented and easier to use; I
> think this descends from the early days of Git, where it was not
> very user friendly. IMHO Git has much improved since. Mercurial
> had 'hgbook' from the beginning; Git User's Manual is more recent.
Also, there is http://book.git-scm.com/ that is similar to hgbook, I think.
Thanks for the comprarision!
--
. Hoc est simplicissimum!
..: maxim.vuets.name