Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 29, 2008, 19:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081029191140.GB29357@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0810281445190.22125@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, walt wrote: > > > walt wrote: > > > No, no, I'm not the one calling for a vote. You old-timers here will > > > know the name Matt Dillon, who is leading the dragonflybsd project > > > (www.dragonflybsd.org). > > > > > > Matt is the one who is calling for the vote in his thread "Vote for > > > your source control system" in the dragonfly.kernel group, accessible > > > via nntp://nntp.dragonflybsd.org... > > > > The official vote was 19 to 19, plus one for perforce and one for svn. > > Matt has proposed a primary git repository and a mirror in hg, and > > that's being debated now.
FWIW at the Google Summer of Code Mentor Summit this past weekend we had a "Git vs. Hg" talk with both Git and Hg represented by contributors to each project.
Slides are online here:
http://docs.google.com/Presentation?id=dcfz2dg9_0hqqz3dsr
-- Shawn.