Re: [PATCH 5/5] commit-graph: add repo arg to graph readers

> On 6/21/2018 7:06 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
>>>> index 0030e79940..38c12b002f 100644
>>>> --- a/commit.c
>>>> +++ b/commit.c
>>>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ struct tree *get_commit_tree(const struct 
>>>> commit *commit)
>>>>          if (commit->graph_pos == COMMIT_NOT_FROM_GRAPH)
>>>>                  BUG("commit has NULL tree, but was not loaded from 
>>>> commit-graph");
>>>>
>>>> -       return get_commit_tree_in_graph(commit);
>>>> +       return get_commit_tree_in_graph(the_repository, commit);
>>> Here..
>>>
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   struct object_id *get_commit_tree_oid(const struct commit *commit)
>>>> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int parse_commit_gently(struct commit *item, 
>>>> int quiet_on_missing)
>>>>                  return -1;
>>>>          if (item->object.parsed)
>>>>                  return 0;
>>>> -       if (parse_commit_in_graph(item))
>>>> +       if (parse_commit_in_graph(the_repository, item))
>>> and here
>>>
>>>> +static void test_parse_commit_in_graph(const char *gitdir, const 
>>>> char *worktree,
>>>> +                                      const struct object_id 
>>>> *commit_oid)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct repository r;
>>>> +       struct commit *c;
>>>> +       struct commit_list *parent;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * Create a commit independent of any repository.
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       c = lookup_commit(commit_oid);
>>> .. and this one are unfortunate as the rest of the object store series
>>> has not progressed as far as needed.
>> I think the first 2 are in reverse - get_commit_tree depends on
>> get_commit_tree_in_graph and parse_commit_gently depends on
>> parse_commit_in_graph, so we need the commit-graph functions to be
>> changed first. But I agree about lookup_commit.
>>
>>> The lookup_commit series is out there already, and that will
>>> teach lookup_commit a repository argument. When rerolling
>>> that series I need to switch the order of repo_init and lookup_commit
>>> such that we can pass the repo to the lookup.
>> For future reference, Stefan is talking about this series:
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180613230522.55335-1-sbeller@google.com/
>>
>> Let me know if you want to reroll yours on top of mine, or vice versa. I
>> think it's clearer if mine goes in first, though, since (as you said in
>> that e-mail) parse_commit depends on this change in the commit graph.
>
> I was about to comment that I thought 'parse_commit_in_graph' should 
> take a 'struct commit_graph' instead of 'struct repository', except 
> for these lookup_commit() calls will need the repository parameter.
>
> Please also keep in mind that ds/commit-graph-fsck has already updated 
> this method to parse from a specific graph [1]. I'm just waiting for 
> some things like ds/generation-numbers to get into 'master' and some 
> more object-store patches to be final before I re-roll that series. I 
> mentioned this in a message that I had sent, but apparently didn't 
> make it on the list (so I re-sent it recently).
>
> [1] 
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180608135548.216405-4-dstolee@microsoft.com/