Re: [PATCH] Update packfile transfer protocol documentation
- From
Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 3, 2009, 22:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <d411cc4a0911031405x60ea2396o35eea78a0b07fda9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091103005815.GW10505@spearce.org>
Junio,
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes: >> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> > ... >> >> Shouldn't we say "the client MUST NOT make reference update request if >> >> everything is up to date" which would imply that in practice there is no >> >> reason to send an empty pack data? > > Creating new branch quirk aside, I do agree with this. Clients > shouldn't send no-op updates if it knows in advance the update is > a no-op. > > -- > Shawn. >
Would you prefer that I try to incorporate all these comments and submit another patch, or are you going to modify it in-tree?
Thanks, Scott